{
 "id": "plate-vii",
 "number": "VII",
 "title": "The Elements",
 "act": {
  "number": "III",
  "title": "The Law"
 },
 "corpus_scope": "698,507 negative units across all twelve objects, 2018–2026 · ground → law → remedy, decomposed at the unit level",
 "question": "What does a charge like \"lacks novelty\" actually say, once split into what was observed, the rule invoked, and the remedy demanded?",
 "page_url": "https://atlas-of-judgment.pages.dev/",
 "figures": [
  {
   "id": "fig-7a",
   "title": "The decomposition of a charge: novelty",
   "deck": "Pick a docket: every charge decomposes into what was observed, the laws it invokes, and the remedy it demands — 26–40% of denials state their rule in words.",
   "dom_host": "#elem-tri",
   "claims": [
    {
     "id": "7a-stated-rate",
     "statement": "26–40% of denials state their rule in words across the twelve dockets; the rest leave it implicit (min: clarity 26.4%, max: novelty 40.4%).",
     "value": {
      "quantity": [
       0.26,
       0.4
      ],
      "unit": "share_of_denials_with_stated_rule"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "[docket].stated",
     "derivation": "count of denials whose rule text was extracted by the sentence-mining pattern / count of all denials, per docket, min and max across the 12 dockets",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": null,
     "verified": "checked against shipped JSON, 2026-08-25",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "law-share-is-floor"
     ]
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "fig-7c",
   "title": "What each charge asks of you",
   "deck": "Every docket has a remedy signature: clarity wants writing (90%), baselines want experiments (80%), reproducibility wants disclosure (76%) — and novelty, alone, wants nothing at all 39% of the time.",
   "dom_host": "#elem-matrix",
   "claims": [
    {
     "id": "7c-novelty-no-remedy",
     "statement": "Novelty leaves 39% of its denials without any road back.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": 0.39,
      "unit": "share_of_denials_without_remedy"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "novelty.remedies",
     "derivation": "n(remedy=='none') / n(all denials), docket=novelty",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": "data-elem7c=\"novelty-none\"",
     "verified": "D10 number audit, 2026-08-24",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "remedy-share-is-floor"
     ]
    },
    {
     "id": "7c-others-offer-remedy",
     "statement": "Every other charge offers a remedy 82–92% of the time.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": [
       0.82,
       0.92
      ],
      "unit": "share_of_denials_with_remedy"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "[docket].remedies",
     "derivation": "min/max across the other eleven dockets of 1 - n(remedy=='none')/n(all denials)",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": "data-elem7c=\"others-offer\"",
     "verified": "D10 number audit, 2026-08-24",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "remedy-share-is-floor"
     ]
    },
    {
     "id": "7c-remedy-signatures",
     "statement": "Clarity's remedy is 90% writing (articulate), baselines' is 80% experiments (substantiate), reproducibility's is 76% disclosure.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": [
       0.9,
       0.8,
       0.76
      ],
      "unit": "share_of_docket_denials_by_remedy_type"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "[docket].remedies",
     "derivation": "clarity.remedies.articulate, baselines_ablations.remedies.evidence, reproducibility.remedies.report, each as share of that docket's denials",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": "data-elem7c=\"three-remedies\"",
     "verified": "D10 number audit, 2026-08-24",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "remedy-share-is-floor"
     ]
    },
    {
     "id": "7c-redesign-rare",
     "statement": "\"Redesign\" is rare everywhere — only theory shows any at scale, at 7%.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": 0.07,
      "unit": "share_of_docket_denials"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "theory.remedies",
     "derivation": "theory.remedies.method as share of theory's denials, compared against near-zero for the other eleven dockets",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": "data-elem7c=\"redesign-rare\"",
     "verified": "D10 number audit, 2026-08-24",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "remedy-share-is-floor"
     ]
    },
    {
     "id": "7c-length-artifact-ruled-out",
     "statement": "The novelty no-remedy gap is not a terseness artifact: it persists inside every quartile of unit length — novelty offers a fix for 60–61% of its denials in each quartile, against 76–94% for the other objects.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": [
       0.6,
       0.61,
       0.76,
       0.94
      ],
      "unit": "share_with_remedy_by_length_quartile"
     },
     "source_island": "elements-all.json",
     "source_path": "novelty.remedies",
     "derivation": "share of denials with any remedy, computed within each of four unit-length quartiles, novelty vs. the other eleven objects",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py",
     "dom_ref": null,
     "verified": "D10 number audit, 2026-08-24",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "remedy-share-is-floor"
     ]
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "fig-7d",
   "title": "The interchangeable syllogism",
   "deck": "Inside the novelty docket, the observation barely narrows the rule and the rule barely narrows the ask: the syllogism's stages are nearly interchangeable parts.",
   "dom_host": "#arg-fig",
   "claims": [
    {
     "id": "7d-faint-coupling",
     "statement": "The ground->warrant and warrant->demand transitions depart from independence unambiguously (chi2 3,690 and 4,601 at n=30,447) but faintly: Cramer's V 0.116 and 0.137; the strongest merged channel runs 1.88x chance, and the natural pair 'assembly of known parts -> combination is not a contribution' just 1.22x.",
     "value": {
      "quantity": 0.116,
      "unit": "cramers_v",
      "n": 30447
     },
     "source_island": "argument-raw-novelty.json",
     "source_path": "gw, wd",
     "derivation": "chi-square of each transition matrix against the product of its marginals (the marginal-preserving shuffle null); V = sqrt(chi2/(n*(k-1))); lifts = observed / expected. Quoted at the raw k-means grain (10 grounds x 10 warrants x 8 demands + no-ask), before display merging.",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_argument_raw.py",
     "dom_ref": null,
     "verified": "recomputed from shipped JSON, 2026-08-27",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "7d-faintness-is-the-finding",
      "7d-distillation-floor"
     ]
    },
    {
     "id": "7d-noask-corroboration",
     "statement": "39.4% of the 30,447 nine-year novelty denials ask for nothing — independently corroborating Fig. 7c's 39% (measured on the 2026 elements pipeline); the combination rule is the emptiest-handed (49% of its uses ask nothing, 1.24x the docket base), rigor-doubt reasoning the fullest (25%).",
     "value": {
      "quantity": 0.394,
      "unit": "share_of_denials",
      "n": 30447
     },
     "source_island": "argument-raw-novelty.json",
     "source_path": "no_demand, wd[:][8]",
     "derivation": "12,006 / 30,447 = 39.4%; per-warrant no-ask rate = wd[w][8] / sum(wd[w])",
     "recompute": "scripts/build_argument_raw.py",
     "dom_ref": null,
     "verified": "recomputed from shipped JSON, 2026-08-27",
     "caveat_refs": [
      "7d-distillation-floor"
     ]
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "caveats": [
  {
   "id": "law-share-is-floor",
   "text": "The sentence-mining pattern that detects a stated rule is a prior about normative phrasing, so all stated-law shares are floors, not exact counts of every implicit rule.",
   "scope": "Fig. 7a stated-law shares (including the 26–40% door)",
   "verified_by": null
  },
  {
   "id": "remedy-share-is-floor",
   "text": "Remedy shares for the eleven extended objects are estimated on 40,000-fix samples per object where fixes exceed that, and each docket's fixes are read through eight clusters — so an exact 0% means rarer than the clustering resolves, a floor rather than a measured absence.",
   "scope": "Fig. 7c remedy-mix shares",
   "verified_by": null
  },
  {
   "id": "7d-faintness-is-the-finding",
   "text": "Faintness is the finding: this figure must not be quoted as 'criticism has a logic-grammar after all.' A 1.9x channel over a 1.00 floor is a lean, not a law."
  },
  {
   "id": "7d-distillation-floor",
   "text": "The stages are the model's distillation of the reviewer's words; a distiller that phrases rules generically could smooth real structure away, so the lifts are floors, not ceilings."
  }
 ],
 "links": {
  "recompute_scripts": [
   "scripts/build_elements_all_data.py"
  ],
  "data": [
   "/api/v1/data/elements-all.json"
  ],
  "related_plates": [
   "plate-i",
   "plate-viii"
  ]
 }
}